Sourcetree vs gitx dev code#
Sourcetree vs gitx dev free#
Sourcetree vs gitx dev mac#
Sourcetree vs gitx dev windows#

Other users find it awkward to dig down by repository to do work. The setup is particularly comfortable for people accustomed to the Git command-line interface. Some developers like the progression/task model of the Sourcetree GUI. Some examples include a window for bookmarks, a toolbar/sidebar window for repositories and one for history.

Sourcetree vs gitx dev windows#

Sourcetree provides a task-organized GUI, with different windows to support specific tasks. However, if you need to mix client platforms, uniformity is an important characteristic of the Git GUI to keep in mind. Developers don't jump between operating systems often, and programming teams rarely shift from one client platform to another.

Sourcetree vs gitx dev mac#

Keep in mind that a development team uses a variety of client systems and that new employees might individually prefer Windows, Mac or Linux clients. Sourcetree only supports Windows and Mac, but developers can still use the product to produce, manage and deploy Linux code. GitKraken supports Linux, but specifically a Linux client - i.e., the system on which the developer works. The GUI doesn't impose a project methodology the tool supports the user's approach. From there, it's possible to dig down for specific tasks. GitKraken can also show commit structures in graph form and detect merge conflicts.ĭevelopers say the GitKraken GUI is 'modern,' meaning its interface presents a unified view of the developer-to-Git relationship in a single panel.

Sourcetree vs gitx dev code#

The GitKraken GUI offers familiar features like undo/redo support, drag-and-drop capability and a built-in code editor. This basic GUI structure makes GitKraken look a bit like a typical PC-based application's GUI - simple for users who haven't worked with Git to grasp. The right side of the screen has a commit panel. GitKraken provides a single-screen GUI, with a left sidebar that presents repositories, a toolbar and tab area where you open specific tasks.

The GitKraken GUI looks and works the same on all the platforms where it runs.

GitKraken runs on Linux, which is critical for companies developing on or for Linux cloud servers.

The tool is easy to learn for users with little Git familiarity.

The GUI is well-architected, attractive and intuitive.

Users cite three primary reasons for picking GitKraken over Sourcetree: Let's start with the more popular of the two Git GUIs: GitKraken. Teams that mix developers with long Git histories and individuals with only recent exposure will sometimes use both clients. Sourcetree is a question of GUI quality versus package features.

Newer Git users, however, find the GUI logical and attractive.įor many users, the choice of GitKraken vs. Development teams with Git experience say GitKraken lacks the scope of features that Sourcetree offers. The goal was to create a strong, visual and useful GUI that ran on anything and supported easy extension.

Users who adopted the product early in its life love it - one even described the tool as 'beautiful.' However, new Git users might find it awkward how the tool organizes steps into tasks and the ways the UI represents tasks.Īxosoft released GitKraken in 2015, after two developers created the tool during a vendor-sponsored experiment. Sourcetree supports most Git-related tasks, which means you don't need to revert to the command line to do specialized things - but you can, if you choose. Users like the product's clean aesthetic and the logical approach it provides without compromising Git's power and value proposition. Atlassian has enhanced the tool - though some users say sparingly - since its introduction in 2013.

Sourcetree is a simple, powerful Git GUI.

Sourcetree vs gitx dev free#

Two of the Git GUIs developers choose most often include Axosoft's GitKraken and Atlassian's Sourcetree both tools are open source and available with free versions.

There are more than a dozen Git GUI tools with different features and designs. A good Git GUI can be an equalizer - a way to ensure everyone works with the repository at comparable levels of skill and comfort. Git repositories are usually central to team development.